Dental Clinic East Tennessee at Amazon
|
The Coggins’ test is for a severe equine virus called equine infectious anemia (EIA). There is no vaccine or heal for EIA, which is likewise known as “swamp fever” because of the warm, wet regions of the United States in which it is more common. There are three stages to EIA. The acute stage is when the horse shows the sensations or changes of the disease, which include fever; listlessness; swelling in the chest, belly or legs; and no appetite. Although, while the infection progresses, he may not show any sensations or changes at all, and it may take over a month for the horse to test positive on the Coggins’ test. According to the Indiana State Board of Animal Health, amongst 30 and 50 percent of horses infected with EIA die within two to four weeks of showing firstborn symptoms. Horses that survive the acute phase enter the chronic phase where they will have recurring sensations or changes of the sickness including weight loss, fever and anemia. Such horses may survive up to a year or more in this stage before at long last consenting reluctantly to the disease. While appearing healthful at a heap of times, horses may experience acute sequences again when underneath stress such as when faced with hot weather, hard work or other disease, according to the Indiana State Board of Animal Health. EIA is transmitted to horses by insects such as deerflies and horseflies. It may also be transmitted to horses through instruments contaminated with infected blood such as needles or tattoo equipment. Some horses may also be in the asymptomatic carrier stage where they do not show any signs of impairment of normal physiological function but will test positive on the Coggins’ test. But these horses may likewise experience acute sequences when stressed. The Indiana State Board of Animal Health notes that these horses in the asymptomatic carrier stage present the greatest risk to healthful horses in public gatherings like horse shows or clinics because they appear healthy. Surviving horses are unable to wholly clear themselves of the virus and will stay infected for the rest of their lives, according to the Animal Disease Diagnostic Laboratory at Purdue University. Affective control of the disease depends on isolation of new, sick, untested or in a positive manner testing horses; hygiene with regard to needles and like instrumentation such as dental tools, fly control and identification of positive animals. Horse owners are oftentimes required to submit a negative Coggins’ test in order to show, move to a new stable, trade their horse or transport their horse all over state lines. A negative Coggins’ test proves that your horse is safe to have around other healthful horses. According to the US Department of Agriculture (USDA) Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) fact sheet on the EIA virus, it is the “first persistent virus for which antigenic drift was defined. (Antigenic drift is the virus’s capacity to change it is form sufficiently so that it is no longer vulnerable to existent antibodies.)” To determine if a horse is negative on a Coggins’ test, a blood sample from the horse is tested for the presence of EIA antibodies. Antibodies are proteins formulated by the immune system that recognizes and helps fight contagions and other alien substances in the body. The antibody is specific to the EIA antigen (a alien substance causing an immune response). The Coggins’ test was developed by Dr. Leroy Coggins, a veterinary virologist, in the 1970s. According to the Animal Disease Diagnostic Laboratory at Purdue University, the test has a 95% accuracy rate and is the most applied test for EIA even though other tests may be employed when the results are questionable or to assert diagnosis. According to the USDA APHIS, the part of positives for the Coggins’ test has declined from “nearly 4 percent in 1972 to less than 0.01 percent in 2005.” The agency states that throughout history the disease was present particularly in “hot zones” such as Texas, Oklahoma, Louisiana, Missouri, Tennessee, Alabama, Georgia, North and South Caroline, Virginia, Kentucky, amidst others. Recent figures show that the prevalence of EIA in the United States is roughly less than 8 in 100,000, according to the USDA APHIS. Many states have dissimilar requirements with regard to handling horses positive for EIA. Because there is no heal for the disease, and a horse positive for it is a threat to healthful horses, some states require euthanasia. Others grant for very rigorous quarantine measures, where horses are got rid of from the herd and kept in a 200-yard buffer zone away from all other horses. Some require confinement to a screened stall. Isolated horses are to never have contact with with the rest of the herd again. Though EIA is low in incidence in the United States, to reduce peril of horses being infected with EIA, the USDA APHIS recommends horseowners: Never percentage needles amidst horses. Dispose of needles after each use.
53 of 56 people found the following review helpful. It is also an extremely broad farce. The human sacrifice of Shakin’ Sammy and the Jesus Christ personal appearance tour (actually a beer-swilling, half-naked, bearded Trapper John lashed to a crucifix) are a couple of examples of the exaggerated comic stylings.
This interspersing of drama and comedy makes this an interesting if somewhat unsual read and also makes it a perfect subject for dramatization. When it is in comedy zone, it is way out there. When it is in drama zone, it is quite serious. According to Hooker’s forward, the surgeons in a MASH were exposed to many extremes. With his writing style, Hooker has exposed us to extremes as well.
It is one of my favorite books and I highly recommend it to fans of either the movie or the TV series. The film captures more of the book’s bawdy, ribald spirit. The TV show captures more of the sentiment.
I also recommend “MASH: An Army Surgeon In Korea” by Otto F. Apel if you want the real story of what life in a MASH was. If you are a fan of the film/book/series and think you have an understanding of how rough it was back then, read this. It was a lot worse. An excellent read.
Add both of these books to your collection and then thank your lucky stars this isn’t 1951 and you are draft eligible. 16 of 16 people found the following review helpful. 9 of 9 people found the following review helpful. I thought the movie was brilliant (I actually think it’s better than the book) and I liked the TV show at first, until cast members started bailing out and were replaced by whining, “enlightened” characters who enabled Alan Alda to whine about the US Army and “War is Hell.” It would be akin to the Delta House from ANIMAL HOUSE organizing a peace rally or marching for civil rights. You get the idea. You’ll see just how far off track the final seasons of the show went by watching the film and reading the original novel. MASH isn’t as well written or satirical as CATCH-22 (good book, disastrous film), but it stays funny and interesting and doesn’t overstay its welcome. Actually, the more buffoonish (Henry Blake) and clownish (Frank Burns, “Hot Lips” Houlihan) characters come off as more real in the novel. I know the film and definitely the show tried to avoid references to the Korean War (because they wanted the war to represent any war, like Vietnam at the time of the film), but I appreciated the short references to the Korean battles and such in the novel. If you’re a fan, check it out. |





